<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
	xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">

	<channel>
    
		<title>Rawls McNelis + Mitchell: Medical Malpractice Defense Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.rawlsmcnelis.com/</link>
		<description>Stay up-to-date with the latest content from Rawls McNelis + Mitchell.</description>
		<dc:language>en</dc:language>
		<dc:rights>Copyright 2011</dc:rights>
		<dc:date>2011-08-16T13:26:54+00:00</dc:date>
    
		
			<item>
				<title>Should Trying a Complex Malpractice Case be Fun?</title>
				<link>http://www.rawlsmcnelis.com/blogs/medical-malpractice-defense/should-trying-a-complex-malpractice-case-be-fun</link>
				<guid>http://www.rawlsmcnelis.com/blogs/medical-malpractice-defense/should-trying-a-complex-malpractice-case-be-fun</guid>
				<description><![CDATA[<p>
	Over twenty years ago I had just started into the business of defending doctors in malpractice cases. One of my early trials was in a small town in Southside Virginia.&nbsp; I represented a surgeon and the anesthesiologist was represented by a much older lawyer &ndash; a man the age of my father and, like my father, a World War II veteran.&nbsp;&nbsp; The case was a contentious one, the plaintiff&rsquo;s lawyer a tough and often unpleasant character.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	We were in the third day of trial and the poor doctors had been beaten up pretty hard by this point.&nbsp; All they had heard about was what lousy physicians they were and the horrible injuries they had caused the plaintiff.&nbsp; From the lawyer perspective the case had not gone poorly.&nbsp; We had scored some points on the plaintiff&rsquo;s experts and there had been no real surprises. The jury seemed to be unimpressed with the plaintiff&rsquo;s case.</p>
<p>
	In the middle of the third day, the court adjourned for lunch and the four of us went out. My fellow lawyer was a man who wanted meat with his meal, preferably fried and on a bun, so we all ended up at Hardees.&nbsp; (I have since reformed my personal eating habits.)&nbsp; The doctors were sitting there, really sort of pale and dejected looking. They were barely eating.&nbsp; Holding a french fry and seeming to contemplate it, the other lawyer looked around at the rest of us and commented that our trial was going well, very well in fact.&nbsp; I agreed and the doctors kind of shrugged.&nbsp; He then looked at me, smiled and said loudly:&nbsp; &ldquo;Brewster, can you believe we get paid for having this much fun?&rdquo;&nbsp; The doctors almost gagged and I was fearful that one or both would lose what little they had eaten.&nbsp; This trial was plainly not their idea of a good time.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	No.&nbsp; For any doctor a malpractice case is anything but fun.&nbsp; Being accused of hurting or killing your patient, which is the gist of all malpractice cases, is a painful accusation.&nbsp; It cuts to the quick for almost every doctor I have ever represented.&nbsp; Trials are hard and most doctors take the attacks upon them quite personally.</p>
<p>
	But for a trial lawyer &ndash; at least for one who truly likes trying cases &ndash; trials are fun.&nbsp; That is not to say that trying a case does not involve huge amounts of stress and the volume of work required in a short time can be staggering.&nbsp; However, as I see it a trial is the absolute culmination of what we do.&nbsp; The intense focus and constant judgment calls shut out almost all the other mundane issues of life and law practice.&nbsp; If a lawyer does not look forward to doing this &ndash; does not relish the challenge of mental combat &ndash; then he or she should probably do something else for a living.&nbsp; And a doctor represented by such a lawyer is simply not getting the full measure of what he or she needs to get through this difficult process.&nbsp;</p>
<p>
	Maybe it is like that Mars and Venus thing.&nbsp; Doctors and lawyers just look at the world differently.&nbsp; Yet, crazy as the notion may seem to a scientifically trained and highly educated physician, that professional wants and needs an attorney who is, above all, passionate about defending them. Of course, you need a lawyer who is smart, well trained and experienced, but, yes, that doctor also needs a lawyer who thinks a trial is &ldquo;fun.&rdquo;&nbsp;</p>
]]></description> 
				<dc:date>2011-08-16T13:26:54+00:00</dc:date>
			</item>
		
    
	</channel>

</rss>
